|
Post by Fred Richards on Mar 24, 2016 13:09:20 GMT -8
So, does this mean if Alliance-Wrestling moves to Texas, PJ leaves the board for good? I doubt it. Plus if anyone thinks that Kahagas didn't do any good for the NWA and the NWA Worlds Championship, doesn't have a clue. I could not agree more. Kahagas was and remains main event caliber on any card under any banner in any arena.
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Mar 24, 2016 16:42:52 GMT -8
Interesting, Alliance forum moving to TX and the other alliance moving to Rocky Mountain High!
Congrats?
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 26, 2016 7:30:38 GMT -8
No, you deleted an entire page of posts discussing the importance of using graphics because someone took a shot at Tharpe in the opening post. About 6-7 strong posts and when I questioned you about it, you removed my question and the thread died a very quick death. That was you, you admitted to it. Don't exaggerate. I removed 3 posts from the NWA North East thread. One by Tony Brooklyn talking about graphics of the NWA Website, one by Dave Marquez talking about something he put in place and was dumped when the new group took over, and one by beltfanchris about liking the old group better than the new (all off topic) but I left your post criticizing the graphics because it was on topic. If anything else was removed it wasn't done by me. Trust me if I remove anything I'll say so and why.
|
|
|
Post by BeltFanChris on Mar 26, 2016 15:26:31 GMT -8
No, you deleted an entire page of posts discussing the importance of using graphics because someone took a shot at Tharpe in the opening post. About 6-7 strong posts and when I questioned you about it, you removed my question and the thread died a very quick death. That was you, you admitted to it. Don't exaggerate. I removed 3 posts from the NWA North East thread. One by Tony Brooklyn talking about graphics of the NWA Website, one by Dave Marquez talking about something he put in place and was dumped when the new group took over, and one by beltfanchris about liking the old group better than the new (all off topic) but I left your post criticizing the graphics because it was on topic. If anything else was removed it wasn't done by me. Trust me if I remove anything I'll say so and why. And I did apologize for my post
|
|
|
Post by shawn on Mar 27, 2016 7:27:45 GMT -8
My new name should be Anti-Snitches.
But yeah, as you can see Polejump is a nightmare on every message board he visits.
|
|
|
Post by NWA Fanatic on Mar 27, 2016 7:59:17 GMT -8
My new name should be Anti-Snitches. But yeah, as you can see Polejump is a nightmare on every message board he visits. You seem to follow in those footsteps though.
|
|
|
Post by philvarlese on Mar 27, 2016 11:36:11 GMT -8
No, you deleted an entire page of posts discussing the importance of using graphics because someone took a shot at Tharpe in the opening post. About 6-7 strong posts and when I questioned you about it, you removed my question and the thread died a very quick death. That was you, you admitted to it. Don't exaggerate. I removed 3 posts from the NWA North East thread. One by Tony Brooklyn talking about graphics of the NWA Website, one by Dave Marquez talking about something he put in place and was dumped when the new group took over, and one by beltfanchris about liking the old group better than the new (all off topic) but I left your post criticizing the graphics because it was on topic. If anything else was removed it wasn't done by me. Trust me if I remove anything I'll say so and why. Are there forum rules clearly posted here? I took a quick look and didn't see any. I think you'd avoid much of the "Admins are unfair" accusations if the posting rules were available for all to see. I run several non wrestling forums on Facebook, and the few rules I do have in my groups are pinned posts, so when they're violated, no one can claim that I'm being arbitrary. Truly, I feel like removing posts should never happen (even when not on topic - ask how their post relates to the topic at hand & then let them explain) unless they violate one of the posting rules.
|
|
|
Post by MKCS on Mar 27, 2016 15:02:26 GMT -8
My new name should be Anti-Snitches. But yeah, as you can see Polejump is a nightmare on every message board he visits. I post on two (this one and WF) and I have no trouble on WF, never been banned or threatened with a ban. I clash with the crazy TNA fan boys but that's literally three guys, just like I clash with the three NWA fan boys here
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 27, 2016 18:30:19 GMT -8
Don't exaggerate. I removed 3 posts from the NWA North East thread. One by Tony Brooklyn talking about graphics of the NWA Website, one by Dave Marquez talking about something he put in place and was dumped when the new group took over, and one by beltfanchris about liking the old group better than the new (all off topic) but I left your post criticizing the graphics because it was on topic. If anything else was removed it wasn't done by me. Trust me if I remove anything I'll say so and why. Are there forum rules clearly posted here? I took a quick look and didn't see any. I think you'd avoid much of the "Admins are unfair" accusations if the posting rules were available for all to see. I run several non wrestling forums on Facebook, and the few rules I do have in my groups are pinned posts, so when they're violated, no one can claim that I'm being arbitrary. Truly, I feel like removing posts should never happen (even when not on topic - ask how their post relates to the topic at hand & then let them explain) unless they violate one of the posting rules. I know they have been posted. Honestly if they were 100% enforced the board would probably shut down based on #3 I will say this since the time I did delete those three posts I have learned how to split post off and move them to other and/or new threads which I have also done a couple of times. 1. Wrestling is the topic unless otherwise stated in the board. 2. If you are Optimistic, there is no need to bully others into cheering along. 3. If you are Pessimistic, bitch once, then be funny or offer a solution. Don't bitch twice, it's alright.
4. Match Results, Interviews, "NEWZ" should include sources. 5. Use the F-word once a month maximum. 6. Play Nice. 7. No Thread Hijacking
|
|
|
Post by JADEN on Mar 27, 2016 19:07:39 GMT -8
5 is the hardest one for me
|
|
|
Post by MKCS on Mar 28, 2016 0:05:47 GMT -8
5 is the hardest one for me Why? Regularly swearing is a sign of unintelligence and a lack of vocabulary
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Mar 28, 2016 9:10:59 GMT -8
My new name should be Anti-Snitches. But yeah, as you can see Polejump is a nightmare on every message board he visits. Are you suggesting that Fred and I are "snitches"? Lets play a hypothetical game for a minute. Lets pretend you are locked up and in jail....DUI....immigration problem....something like that. Your lawyer is banging your wife while you are in the clink. He's getting payment any way he can. Do you think thats ethical? Would you feel like a "snitch" if you found out and went to the regulatory committee and filed a complaint? Or, would you feel that your actions are justified? I guess you are suggesting that you would do nothing, because you don't want to be a snitch. Are you the type that would not cooperate with investigators if you were witness to a crime? I get the feeling the answer is yes. Obviously our situation isn't anything near the hypothetical I used above. Although, the story above is a "brag" story I was once told by a lawyer "friend". Lawyers must handle themselves ethically. It's not just a suggestion, it's a code of conduct they must live up to. While our former "partner" was our lawyer as defined by our operating agreement, we also had a corporate lawyer when it came to the case against PWO...because we didn't want to have "conflict of interest". Those same "conflicts of interest" concerns were punted when it came to the cases brought against Fred and I. Thats about as much as I'm going to say about that. In the hypothetical case above, do you think your hypothetical lawyer acted ethically? If you want to do some research to see just how serious of a matter that professional conduct and ethics are to a TX lawyer, you can read this: www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Ethics_Resources&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=14125
|
|
|
Post by MKCS on Mar 28, 2016 10:50:10 GMT -8
Shawn will defend anything Bruce does and will not listen to reason. It's a waste of time even trying.
|
|
|
Post by JADEN on Mar 28, 2016 10:53:45 GMT -8
5 is the hardest one for me Why? Regularly swearing is a sign of unintelligence and a lack of vocabulary That particular vernacular was added to my lexicon early during my development stage & has persisted to this day due to constant subjection to mongoloids, cretans & troglodytes...
|
|
|
Post by JADEN on Mar 28, 2016 11:57:02 GMT -8
|
|