|
Post by MKCS on Mar 6, 2016 10:30:07 GMT -8
Someone on here told me Haas wrestles in a T-Shirt which I don't like but if he's in shape I'd be all for it. Especially since he's based in Texas.
He's unwilling to travel though so I'd like him as a transitional champion.
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Mar 6, 2016 10:50:52 GMT -8
Someone on here told me Haas wrestles in a T-Shirt which I don't like but if he's in shape I'd be all for it. Especially since he's based in Texas. He's unwilling to travel though so I'd like him as a transitional champion. There are people in the organization who like the drop and drop right back approach. It wouldn't surprise me if Charlie beat the champ and then dropped it back to him quick at his promotion in Austin. It would give the alliance a reason to send out a couple of press releases. Dropping to Charlie could get a little media run based on his WWE past. Nothing else is going on otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 6, 2016 16:31:00 GMT -8
Someone on here told me Haas wrestles in a T-Shirt which I don't like but if he's in shape I'd be all for it. Especially since he's based in Texas. He's unwilling to travel though so I'd like him as a transitional champion. Yes, he does wrestle in a T-Shirt. No idea why, he seems to be in good shape. I hate "hot shotting" the title but if it was Haas, I'd be "ok" with it. Still I'm happy it hasn't happened so far All the reigns since Kahagas won the title have been over the median.
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Mar 6, 2016 16:49:14 GMT -8
Someone on here told me Haas wrestles in a T-Shirt which I don't like but if he's in shape I'd be all for it. Especially since he's based in Texas. He's unwilling to travel though so I'd like him as a transitional champion. Yes, he does wrestle in a T-Shirt. No idea why, he seems to be in good shape. I hate "hot shotting" the title but if it was Haas, I'd be "ok" with it. Still I'm happy it hasn't happened so far All the reigns since Kahagas won the title have been over the median. Well....maybe the best thing to do would be to put it on Charlie...then back to Rob. It would keep the Rob/Jax "story" alive as Rob wouldn't have beaten him to get the belt. They have to do something right? It's been painfully quiet.
|
|
|
Post by shawn on Mar 14, 2016 16:38:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 16, 2016 8:15:52 GMT -8
I think it's going to be a good show.
|
|
|
Post by Crazzysteve on Mar 16, 2016 10:18:47 GMT -8
If they do more than 150 paid I'll be surprised
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Mar 16, 2016 14:14:34 GMT -8
So as pro wrestling fans....not alliance fans....pro wrestling fans....which matches are "must see"? Just curious as a promoter who is reformatting my business plan. Anything with Rowe is usually really good.
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 16, 2016 14:56:42 GMT -8
If they do more than 150 paid I'll be surprised He better than that at his last show.
|
|
|
Post by Crazzysteve on Mar 16, 2016 14:59:31 GMT -8
Haha! I'm giving them the benefit of having a bunch of wrestling fans flying in for the weekender, maybe some will travel out (I doubt many).
Another small time event for the dying brand.
So IWHE probably do less than 150 based on DKM's comment. Shows the alliance let any shambles do business with them as long as they foot the bill.
Put the last nail in the coffin.
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 16, 2016 15:13:05 GMT -8
Hate the NWA, hate Bruce, hate me, but to insult someone who is actually trying to do something and has a loyal fan base and is putting in the work tells me your are more like people here say Bruce is.
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 16, 2016 15:18:22 GMT -8
So as pro wrestling fans....not alliance fans....pro wrestling fans....which matches are "must see"? Just curious as a promoter who is reformatting my business plan. Anything with Rowe is usually really good. Define "must see" but I'd go with Rowe vs Mack vs Hoyt plus Charlie Haas challenging Dane for the world title.
|
|
|
Post by Crazzysteve on Mar 16, 2016 15:25:27 GMT -8
Hate the NWA, hate Bruce, hate me, but to insult someone who is actually trying to do something and has a loyal fan base and is putting in the work tells me your are more like people here say Bruce is. Don't really get the comparison. Good luck to whomever is doing the work for Wrestlemania weekend. To not believe it will be successful doesn't make me a crook like the president is accused of. Being a loyalist is one thing but accusing someone of something because of an opinion is slightly stupid.
|
|
|
Post by dkm on Mar 16, 2016 15:54:28 GMT -8
You say he will be lucky to draw 150, I point his shows draw more than that and so you say based on that comment they will probably do less. That is just being an ass, not just sharing an opinion. Now to say if it will be successful or not, we will have to define success and then wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by Crazzysteve on Mar 16, 2016 16:13:42 GMT -8
You say he will be lucky to draw 150, I point his shows draw more than that and so you say based on that comment they will probably do less. That is just being an ass, not just sharing an opinion. Now to say if it will be successful or not, we will have to define success and then wait and see. No it's not being an ass it's mis reading your post. I read it as they didn't even draw that last time which was the opposite of what you said. Success is simple to define, you book a big room you have to fill it. If the room is not full it's not a success, at a time when a dense wrestling fan base are in town to not be close to sold out like most other wrestling events that weekend is failure. I'm judging this event by its presentation, match quality and draw. That's what will define its success but to be blunt if the matches are great and the show is well presented to a minimal crowd it's not a success regardless how you want to try to perceive it.
|
|