|
Post by shawn on Feb 14, 2016 7:27:14 GMT -8
Well Tharpe and crew mess up that situation. Still a bad idea.
|
|
|
Post by MKCS on Feb 14, 2016 21:16:30 GMT -8
Tharpe is a gallah
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Feb 14, 2016 21:36:39 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Fred Richards on Feb 16, 2016 5:21:20 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by fairfax on Feb 18, 2016 2:33:35 GMT -8
And the Midwestern, suburban translation: ASSHOLE!
|
|
|
Post by JADEN on Feb 18, 2016 20:59:42 GMT -8
I would make a North East translation, but Jay limits is to one curse a day
|
|
|
Post by Fred Richards on Feb 23, 2016 7:01:25 GMT -8
Via direct post or PM's, several have asked if Mr. Brooklyn and I are collaborating on an action against a person oft-mentioned in this thread and others.
Let the suspense end. The answer is - - - most definitely; speculation is over.
It will make no difference to most who read these words. And whatever we might do is no reflection upon anyone other than the three people who will soon enjoy the titles of "defendant" and "respondent."
Notice I said "three people." Two have had their respective names mentioned here many times. Now that the documents, electronic mail, text messages and recordings are assembled, we will proceed within the codified system(s).
Great thanks will go to those who lifted themselves out of the septic tanks of a one-horse Texas town and came forward with facts and documents. For their's is the real courage. They serve as a rekindling of the belief that good apples outnumber the rotten ones.
What we might do/accomplish is not just for the two of us. Quite a few people, some within this industry, suffered financial detriments, humiliation and mental anguish. Some of those people we like - others not so much. Nonetheless, it is time to do what is right under our laws, etc.
Now if we were being driven by a lust for sheer revenge, we could inform the notorious drug dealer that the person-in-mention alleges he slept with the man's wife while hubby was rotting in the calaboose waiting for this pillar of justice to spring him. Seems that when you're smoking, sniffing, shorting, shooting and swallowing your discretion ain't what it ought to be.
Lots more to disclose. Ex parte deals "in chambers." Political "contributions" that some might adjudge to be graft that were offered and accepted. And that private investigator report commissioned by some good people and former opponents about you-know-who's illegal substance activities might prove interesting at his peer review. See, they have the "stuff." Neighbor's statements, photos and more.
Sad part, for "him," is that when others find themselves possibly culpable as accessories, they often get an "attack of canary" so as to secure immunity and avoid seeing their own careers, etc. crash and burn. In re the instant matter, that is definitely foreseeable. In fact, it's quite probable.
Yeah, we have it. The dates, times, places and the hard core, indisputable evidence. Took a great effort to put it together, but you'd be amazed at what motivation can help produce.
Stay with us, y'all. Even though it's wrestling - - you're gonna be amazed at what you learn very, very soon.
I think the court system and two professional regulatory/oversight commissions and committees will be, too.
And to our good pal in California - - find your balls, sonny. You want to discuss something, be the man you would have some believe you are and do it first person. The guy in Vegas ain't your patsy. Dig???
|
|
|
Post by MKCS on Feb 23, 2016 10:21:29 GMT -8
Via direct post or PM's, several have asked if Mr. Brooklyn and I are collaborating on an action against a person oft-mentioned in this thread and others. Let the suspense end. The answer is - - - most definitely; speculation is over. It will make no difference to most who read these words. And whatever we might do is no reflection upon anyone other than the three people who will soon enjoy the titles of "defendant" and "respondent." Notice I said "three people." Two have had their respective names mentioned here many times. Now that the documents, electronic mail, text messages and recordings are assembled, we will proceed within the codified system(s). Great thanks will go to those who lifted themselves out of the septic tanks of a one-horse Texas town and came forward with facts and documents. For their's is the real courage. They serve as a rekindling of the belief that good apples outnumber the rotten ones. What we might do/accomplish is not just for the two of us. Quite a few people, some within this industry, suffered financial detriments, humiliation and mental anguish. Some of those people we like - others not so much. Nonetheless, it is time to do what is right under our laws, etc. Now if we were being driven by a lust for sheer revenge, we could inform the notorious drug dealer that the person-in-mention alleges he slept with the man's wife while hubby was rotting in the calaboose waiting for this pillar of justice to spring him. Seems that when you're smoking, sniffing, shorting, shooting and swallowing your discretion ain't what it ought to be. Lots more to disclose. Ex parte deals "in chambers." Political "contributions" that some might adjudge to be graft that were offered and accepted. And that private investigator report commissioned by some good people and former opponents about you-know-who's illegal substance activities might prove interesting at his peer review. See, they have the "stuff." Neighbor's statements, photos and more. Sad part, for "him," is that when others find themselves possibly culpable as accessories, they often get an "attack of canary" so as to secure immunity and avoid seeing their own careers, etc. crash and burn. In re the instant matter, that is definitely foreseeable. In fact, it's quite probable. Yeah, we have it. The dates, times, places and the hard core, indisputable evidence. Took a great effort to put it together, but you'd be amazed at what motivation can help produce. Stay with us, y'all. Even though it's wrestling - - you're gonna be amazed at what you learn very, very soon. I think the court system and two professional regulatory/oversight commissions and committees will be, too. And to our good pal in California - - find your balls, sonny. You want to discuss something, be the man you would have some believe you are and do it first person. The guy in Vegas ain't your patsy. Dig??? Seems like this thread is about to become a whole lot more popular.
|
|
|
Post by Intereeeeeesting on Feb 23, 2016 14:08:12 GMT -8
Fred is Tharpe aware about this case?
Is it a legal case? What type of prosecution is it?
|
|
|
Post by philvarlese on Feb 24, 2016 7:54:05 GMT -8
Fred is Tharpe aware about this case? Is it a legal case? What type of prosecution is it? I can't speak for Fred, or Chris, or Bruce for that matter. My best guess is that Bruce probably trolls this site, though he'd likely not admit to it. If there is or will be a suit, or any legal action of some sort, he will find out in due time, as most legal proceedings carry notice to the parties involved. I'm also going to go out on a limb and say that even if he did know about any sort of legal proceeding concerning the NWA, he wouldn't respond here, where he run the risk of being verbally lynched. Bruce can't place himself in forums where any criticisms can be discussed, I'm betting his ego won't allow that. I've had an opportunity to view some things that lead me to believe that something fishy has gone one for the past couple of years. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm betting that some people are going to be quite interested (and a few will be uneasy) if this all plays out. Someday, I plan on writing a book about it, for the dozen or so that might be interested.
|
|
|
Post by gmellos on Feb 24, 2016 8:58:43 GMT -8
Fred is Tharpe aware about this case? Is it a legal case? What type of prosecution is it? I can't speak for Fred, or Chris, or Bruce for that matter. My best guess is that Bruce probably trolls this site, though he'd likely not admit to it. If there is or will be a suit, or any legal action of some sort, he will find out in due time, as most legal proceedings carry notice to the parties involved. I'm also going to go out on a limb and say that even if he did know about any sort of legal proceeding concerning the NWA, he wouldn't respond here, where he run the risk of being verbally lynched. Bruce can't place himself in forums where any criticisms can be discussed, I'm betting his ego won't allow that. I've had an opportunity to view some things that lead me to believe that something fishy has gone one for the past couple of years. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm betting that some people are going to be quite interested (and a few will be uneasy) if this all plays out. Someday, I plan on writing a book about it, for the dozen or so that might be interested. Well my take is that I have ALWAYS felt Bruce Tharpe was a BAD steward for the NWA! He has essentially turned the NWA into a vehicle to boost his ego and self-importance. My only hope in that IF Chris and Fred were to win and regain control of the NWA that they don't follow Bruce's model. Use a hybrid of the old system, give members a place at the table while only getting involved to squash drama and disputes.
|
|
|
Post by Fred Richards on Feb 24, 2016 11:22:33 GMT -8
I salute the wisdom and foresight of Phil Varlese. His insight is sharp and penetrating.
Less than 24 hours ago, several parties spoke via group telecom. It was a productive session. New bridges were built and old ones repaired. An exchange of information led to the rightful conclusion that the matter-at-hand is far reaching in scope.
Thugs depend on a divided house. In the instant matter they partner with possibly corrupt officials on a bench. Next, one party lassos a (perhaps) somewhat naive younger person in the same professional group; exposing this person to the point that he/she might bear culpability when justice takes its' toll.
The train wreck that started this upheaval began a few years back. It was laced with misinformation, half-truths, homophobic bias/slurs and more. Open and candid dialogue is the best way to set the record straight and undo the blatant wrongs that were perpetrated.
Such is what is overdue. Such is what is underway. Such is what will be seen-through to conclusion, one way or another.
From California to Vegas to Texas to Florida and elsewhere - people have found their balls.
That makes me and Mister Brooklyn happy.
It won't put smiles on the faces of two - maybe three - whose state flag is emblazoned with a Lone Star.
|
|
|
Post by tonybrooklyn on Feb 24, 2016 12:03:41 GMT -8
No matter where you go, there you are. "Geographical cures" don't work.
Problem not solved.
|
|
|
Post by Jay Cal on Feb 24, 2016 15:57:43 GMT -8
Fred is Tharpe aware about this case? Is it a legal case? What type of prosecution is it? I can't speak for Fred, or Chris, or Bruce for that matter. My best guess is that Bruce probably trolls this site, though he'd likely not admit to it. If there is or will be a suit, or any legal action of some sort, he will find out in due time, as most legal proceedings carry notice to the parties involved. I'm also going to go out on a limb and say that even if he did know about any sort of legal proceeding concerning the NWA, he wouldn't respond here, where he run the risk of being verbally lynched. Bruce can't place himself in forums where any criticisms can be discussed, I'm betting his ego won't allow that. I've had an opportunity to view some things that lead me to believe that something fishy has gone one for the past couple of years. I'm not a lawyer, but I'm betting that some people are going to be quite interested (and a few will be uneasy) if this all plays out. Someday, I plan on writing a book about it, for the dozen or so that might be interested. Can I write the forward?
|
|
|
Post by animus on Feb 24, 2016 17:57:40 GMT -8
*grabs the popcorn*
|
|